2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
ECETOC launches Secondee Programme
News

ECETOC launches Secondee Programme

Looking for an extra challenge? A next step to help develop your career? Consider applying for our Secondee Programme!ECETOC is looking for early-career scientists currently working at a member co...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Why?Validation of NAMs is often overlooked despite its importance for regulatory use. Traditional validation methods are less suitable for NAMs, which focus on key events rather than apical...
Task Force
11.04.2017

Endocrine Disruption

In December 2016, in response to the ‘Outline of draft Guidance Document for the implementation of the hazard-based criteria to identify endocrine disruptors’, published by ECHA and EFSA in December 2016 with support from the JRC, ECETOC organised a special task force to develop science-based guidance showing how the ECHA and EFSA outline to identify endocrine disrupting properties may be put into practice.

With a tight schedule of just 3 months, this task force published in March 2017 Technical Report no.130: The ECETOC Seven Steps for the Identification of Endocrine Disrupting Properties (ECETOC 7SI-ED).

Press release, March 2017.

ECETOC develops Seven Steps for the Identification of
Endocrine Disrupting Properties (ECETOC 7SI-ED)

In a nutshell:

Brussels, March 2017

In response to the ‘Outline of draft Guidance Document for the implementation of the hazard-based criteria to identify endocrine disruptors’, published by ECHA and EFSA in December 2016 with support from the JRC, the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) has developed science-based guidance showing how the ECHA and EFSA outline to identify endocrine disrupting properties may be put into practice.

The Outline of Draft Guidance Document states its intention is to ‘… provide guidance for the implementation of the scientific criteria concerning the hazard-based identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EC) No 1107/2009 and (EU) No 528/2012. The Guidance is intended be suitable for both applicants and regulatory authorities.’

The Outline goes on to say that ‘…the endocrine disruptors identification step will be based exclusively on the evaluation of the relevant hazardous properties of a substance.’ Therefore, ECETOC has focused its expertise on providing input for consideration under Section V of the ECHA and EFSA outline ‘Hazard identification strategy for endocrine disrupting properties’. This has resulted in the development of the ECETOC Seven Steps for the Identification of Endocrine Disrupting properties (ECETOC 7SI-ED). The ECETOC 7SI-ED, that covers human and environmental health, focuses on how to use a weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach to assess available information, to integrate it and determine its sufficiency to conclude on the endocrine disrupting properties of a substance. For this conclusion, the ECETOC 7SI-ED builds on the WHO/IPCS (2002) definition of an endocrine disruptor (ED) and its three components. It offers guidance on how to evaluate and integrate information on each of the three components of the definition of an ED, i.e. how to consider 1) available apical studies to identify adverse effects that may be endocrine mediated; 2) (non-) endocrine activity data and 3) the biological plausibility that these are linked by a specific endocrine mode-of-action (MoA).

The ECETOC 7SI-ED is based on robust scientific principles and has been designed to be practical and transparent in its utility with the framework being presented as a series of discrete logical steps, each of which is supported by a clear set of questions and considerations to guide decision-making. The ECETOC 7SI-ED applies existing relevant scientific concepts and established best practice frameworks and methodologies e.g. OECD EDTA CF (2012); OECD GD No. 150 (2012); the WHO/IPCS MoA Frameworks, the JRC ToxR Tool and ECETOC TR 106 (2009).

In the Technical Report, the seven steps of the ECETOC 7SI-ED are presented as both text and schematically with further guidance on how to address each step. By following this process, the data for any regulated substance can be transparently organised and evaluated to reveal the WoE available, its strengths and uncertainties, to compare with the WHO/IPCS (2002) definition of an ED. This enables a conclusion to be drawn on whether, or not, a substance meets the regulatory definition. The next step for any substance that meets the ED definition criteria is to undergo a comprehensive hazard and risk assessment, including potency and exposure assessment, for which guidance already exists yet is beyond the scope of this document.

ECETOC Technical Report no.130: The ECETOC Seven Steps for the Identification of Endocrine Disrupting Properties (ECETOC 7SI-ED) has been published in March 2017 and can be downloaded from https://goo.gl/75uWn4

 Following the publication of the Technical Report, the ECETOC Endocrine Disruption Task Force , as well as experts from the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) and the European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) have been involved in the public consultation on draft version of the Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009 - dated 7 December, prepared by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Chemicals Agency with the support from the Joint Research Centre (JRC).

The ‘ECETOC, CEFIC, ECPA comments on the Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009 prepared by EFSA and ECHA – dated 5 July 2018 and submitted to DG Sanco’