New ECETOC expert report: Advancing OECD TG 309 biodegradation testing
390508

New ECETOC expert report: Advancing OECD TG 309 biodegradation testing

A new expert meeting report is now available on the ECETOC website exploring how OECD TG 309 can be made more robust and environmentally relevant for chemical persistence assessment. The report ref...
We’re Hiring: Join the ECETOC Team as a Trainee!
390494

We’re Hiring: Join the ECETOC Team as a Trainee!

Are you passionate about science, regulatory toxicology, and making a real-world impact at the intersection of industry, academia, and policy? ECETOC is excited to announce that we’re looking for a...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
TRA Task Force – Worker branch

TRA Task Force – Worker branch

Why? The Worker TRA Task Force has been active since 2019, delivering projects that advance the scientific basis of the Worker Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) tool. Its overarching objective is to e...
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Monograph
08.05.2009

Monograph 038 – Toxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials

This special issue of Toxicology Letters presents new data on the toxicology of typical manufactured nanostructured materials. It includes results from on-going industry and academic projects on the (geno)toxicity of typical manufactured nanoparticles such as titanium dioxide and zinc oxide and newly engineered nanofibres such as carbon nanotubes. Attention is drawn to toxicologically relevant aspects such as characterisation, exposure, mode of action and translocation of these nanomaterials. A summary overviewand outlook concludes this issue. The papers included in this issue are based on presentations given at a symposium organised by the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC). The symposium was held during the 37th Annual Meeting of EEMS, the European Environmental Mutagen Society in Basel, Switzerland, on Tuesday 11 September 2007. Toxicological investigations of nanomaterials often suffer from problems with stability of the test system and specific dosimetry. Early studies frequently lacked sufficient characterisation of the test material or appropriate control groups, i.e. in the absence of microparticle treated groups. Under such conditions, it is impossible to draw conclusions whether nanoparticle-mediated adverse effects are intrinsic to the test material or specific for particle size. Even in present studies, a change of test conditions might alter the results and influence the conclusions. This applies to in vitro models and to single or repeated dose studies in animals where route and mode of application can have different toxicological consequences. In all, to be useful for risk assessment, the model system has to be well characterised and representative of the chosen exposure situation. So far, there are few reports on the primary genotoxic effects of nanomaterials, but it is conceivable that some reactive nanomaterials may have genotoxic activity. It is presently unclear if the nano-scale dimensions could affect the possible genotoxicity. Depending on the inhaled dose, nanomaterials can induce significant inflammation and oxidative stress in the lung, which may trigger secondary genotoxic effects. Secondary genotoxicity mediated by toxicity might allow for the derivation of thresholds, as suggested for inert particles in general.

(Knaapen et al., 2004; Greim and Ziegler-Skylakakis, 2007).


Find out more
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03784274