2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Why?Validation of NAMs is often overlooked despite its importance for regulatory use. Traditional validation methods are less suitable for NAMs, which focus on key events rather than apical...
Monograph
08.05.2009

Monograph 038 – Toxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials

This special issue of Toxicology Letters presents new data on the toxicology of typical manufactured nanostructured materials. It includes results from on-going industry and academic projects on the (geno)toxicity of typical manufactured nanoparticles such as titanium dioxide and zinc oxide and newly engineered nanofibres such as carbon nanotubes. Attention is drawn to toxicologically relevant aspects such as characterisation, exposure, mode of action and translocation of these nanomaterials. A summary overviewand outlook concludes this issue. The papers included in this issue are based on presentations given at a symposium organised by the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC). The symposium was held during the 37th Annual Meeting of EEMS, the European Environmental Mutagen Society in Basel, Switzerland, on Tuesday 11 September 2007. Toxicological investigations of nanomaterials often suffer from problems with stability of the test system and specific dosimetry. Early studies frequently lacked sufficient characterisation of the test material or appropriate control groups, i.e. in the absence of microparticle treated groups. Under such conditions, it is impossible to draw conclusions whether nanoparticle-mediated adverse effects are intrinsic to the test material or specific for particle size. Even in present studies, a change of test conditions might alter the results and influence the conclusions. This applies to in vitro models and to single or repeated dose studies in animals where route and mode of application can have different toxicological consequences. In all, to be useful for risk assessment, the model system has to be well characterised and representative of the chosen exposure situation. So far, there are few reports on the primary genotoxic effects of nanomaterials, but it is conceivable that some reactive nanomaterials may have genotoxic activity. It is presently unclear if the nano-scale dimensions could affect the possible genotoxicity. Depending on the inhaled dose, nanomaterials can induce significant inflammation and oxidative stress in the lung, which may trigger secondary genotoxic effects. Secondary genotoxicity mediated by toxicity might allow for the derivation of thresholds, as suggested for inert particles in general.

(Knaapen et al., 2004; Greim and Ziegler-Skylakakis, 2007).


Find out more
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03784274