ECETOC Publication Highlights Scientific Perspectives on Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing and Future Regulatory Directions
390553

ECETOC Publication Highlights Scientific Perspectives on Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing and Future Regulatory Directions

Brussels, 1 October 2026 – ECETOC is pleased to announce the publication of a new review article in Archives of Toxicology titled “Scientific Perspectives on In Vivo Developmental Neurotoxicity T...
Welcome to Talia Neal-Walthall
390510

Welcome to Talia Neal-Walthall

We are pleased to welcome Talia Neal-Walthall to ECETOC as a secondee. Talia joins us to work on topics related to exposure, an area central to much of our current scientific programme. She will be wi...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
TRA Task Force – Worker branch

TRA Task Force – Worker branch

Why? The Worker TRA Task Force has been active since 2019, delivering projects that advance the scientific basis of the Worker Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) tool. Its overarching objective is to e...
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Monograph
28.07.2002

Monograph 032 – Use of Human Data in Hazard Classification for Irritation and Sensitisation

Mono 032 : Use of Human Data in Hazard Classification for Irritation and Sensitisation | July 2002

Reference to the use of human data is made throughout the European legislation relating to the classification and labelling, as well as risk assessment, of substances and preparations. In addition, relevance of animal test results to man is mentioned. However, no guidance is given on what constitutes acceptable human data. The primary purpose of this report is to provide such guidance and to propose how human data may be used in decisions on the classification of irritation and sensitisation effects and when it may be more appropriate than other data. The provisions in European law for the use of human data are reviewed in Section 2 and Appendix A. In the context of skin, eye and respiratory irritation, and skin and respiratory sensitisation, the classification of a substance or preparation based on consideration of adequate human data may be different from that based only on animal data. Specific examples are described in Section 3 and Appendix B where the classification of substances and preparations appears to be more soundly based when human data are taken into account. Indeed, human data might lead ultimately to a more accurate risk assessment. Human data fall into two main classes, observational and experimental. Section 4 lists the various types of data that may be used for classification purposes and gives guidance on factors which influence their quality. Outline protocols for experimental studies on skin irritation and skin sensitisation are presented. The criteria governing the possible use of such data in the classification process are addressed in Section 5. The Task Force proposes classification criteria based on human data for each endpoint considered (skin, eye and respiratory irritation, skin and respiratory sensitisation). In the context of this report, human clinical studies may be undertaken where there is a perceived need to develop an improved understanding of irritation and sensitisation effects. For chemicals and preparations where skin contact is unavoidable, human data has the potential to provide the most accurate information in terms of hazard and risk assessment. Classification and labelling are based currently on the inherent hazard of a chemical substance or preparation. The proposal is made that, in the future, at least labelling should be based on risk assessment and reflect risk rather than hazard. It is suggested that discussions on the global harmonisation of classification and labelling systems should provide the opportunity inter alia to incorporate quality criteria for the use of human data. The Task Force recommends that human data of good quality should always be taken into account in classification and risk assessment decisions.