2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
ECETOC launches Secondee Programme
News

ECETOC launches Secondee Programme

Looking for an extra challenge? A next step to help develop your career? Consider applying for our Secondee Programme!ECETOC is looking for early-career scientists currently working at a member co...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Why?Validation of NAMs is often overlooked despite its importance for regulatory use. Traditional validation methods are less suitable for NAMs, which focus on key events rather than apical...
JACC
28.10.2006

JACC Report 52 – Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a)

JACC 052 : Trifluoroethane | October 2006

This report has been produced as part of the ECETOC Joint Assessment of Commodity Chemicals (JACC) programme. It presents a critical evaluation of the available data on the ecotoxicity and toxicity of 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HFC-143a), including results of recent and unpublished studies conducted by the Programme for Alternative Fluorocarbon Toxicity Testing (PAFT).
1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a) is a colourless, flammable gas that is mainly used as a blend component for air conditioning and refrigeration systems.
When released into the environment, HFC-143a is expected to volatilise almost entirely into the atmosphere, where it will be slowly degraded via trifluoroacetaldehyde to HF and CO2 as final products. HFC-143a does not deplete the stratospheric ozone layer, but its global warming potential (3,800 relative to CO2) is comparable to 4,000 for trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11).
HFC-143a has not been tested in aquatic organisms. Its environmental toxicity is assumed to be negligible because it volatilises to air.
Following inhalation, HFC-143a is poorly absorbed and rapidly excreted in both laboratory animals and humans. Trifluoroethanol is the principal metabolite in rats.
HFC-143a has a low acute toxicity in rats following inhalation. Cardiac sensitisation to adrenaline was induced in dogs when the HFC-143a was inhaled at a level of 300,000 ppm. Following a 4-week exposure study, there were effects on the testicles of male rats in one study, but two other repeat-exposure studies, one 4 weeks and the other 13 weeks at the same exposure levels, were without any toxic effect. This effect was attributable to confounding factors related to the method of exposure.
In vitro, the genotoxic potential of HFC-143a is low: the majority of the tests were negative. There was no genotoxicity in a micronucleus test in vivo.
Following oral ingestion of HFC-143a for one year, no tumours were observed in rats.
Possible reproductive effects of HFC-143a have not been studied specifically. There was no developmental toxicity seen in studies in rats and rabbits.
Human volunteers showed no adverse effect when exposed for 2 hours to 500 ppm HFC-143a.
In the USA, an occupational exposure limit (8-hour time-weighted average) of 1,000 ppm is recommended by the American Industrial Hygiene Association.