2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Press Release
29.09.2022

ECETOC workshop report sets out steps required to increase acceptance of mathematical modelling in chemical safety assessments

Brussels, 29 September 2022 – Scientific experts at a workshop organised by ECETOC explored how to use mathematical modelling to help extrapolate toxic doses of chemicals found in isolated cell and tissue cultures tested in the lab to expected adverse health responses in live humans and animals, so reducing the need for animal testing in chemical safety assessments. (Read the full article here).

The extent to which a chemical is toxic to humans and animals largely depends on how much of the chemical is absorbed, distributed, metabolised and excreted in the body. Physiologically Based Kinetic (PBK) modelling uses mathematical techniques to quantify and predict the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of a chemical after its exposure to humans or animals.

Although PBK modelling is increasingly used by the scientific community – and several generic PBK platforms are available that all provide similar results when harmonised inputs are used – there are still challenges for EU regulators to accept the models’ predictions for chemical risk assessments.

During the workshop, the scientists therefore proposed several different steps aimed to increase regulators’ confidence in PBK modelling approaches.

First, the contexts and applications in which PBK modelling can be used should be explicitly defined, for example, their use is better accepted in prioritising risk than in establishing reference doses. In human health risk assessments, any lack of data might be addressed if plausible conservative assumptions can be identified. These assumptions must be conservative enough to ensure human health protection.

Second, regulators and the scientific community should agree on the criteria for good-quality model input parameters, especially in the absence of experimental data from animals or humans.

Next, scientists should adopt Good Modelling Practices and a step-by-step approach when developing PBK models to ensure transparency.

Benchmark datasets and standardised metrics need to be developed to evaluate quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation predictions.

Finally, case studies should be developed to increase regulators’ confidence in generic PBK model predictions, as well as providing critical inputs for developing guidelines.

The full report of the ECETOC workshop’s findings has been published in the scientific journal Archives of Toxicology and can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03356-5.