2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
TRA Task Force – Worker branch

TRA Task Force – Worker branch

Why? The Worker TRA Task Force has been active since 2019, delivering projects that advance the scientific basis of the Worker Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) tool. Its overarching objective is to e...
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
News
16.07.2008

New JACC Report on Difluoromethane (HFC-32) CAS No. 75-10-5

'JACC 054' updates an earlier ECETOC review and presents a critical evaluation of the available data on the ecotoxicity, toxicity, environmental fate and impact of difluoromethane (HFC-32).
JACC 054 - Difluoromethane (HFC-32) CAS No. 75-10-5 (Second Edition)

This report has been produced as part of the ECETOC Joint Assessment of Commodity Chemicals (JACC) programme. It updates an earlier ECETOC review[1] and presents a critical evaluation of the available data on the ecotoxicity, toxicity, environmental fate and impact of difluoromethane (HFC-32). The report includes results of recent and unpublished studies conducted by the Programme for Alternative Fluorocarbon Toxicity Testing (PAFT)[2].

Difluoromethane (HFC-32) is a colourless, flammable gas that is used in refrigerant blends with other hydrofluorocarbons. Any HFC-32 released to the environment will volatilise to the atmosphere where it has been detected. In air, HFC-32 will degrade slowly to carbon dioxide and hydrogen fluoride. HFC-32 does not accumulate in living organisms and there is low risk to the aquatic environment. HFC-32 does not deplete stratospheric ozone because it does not contain chlorine or bromine. The contribution of HFC-32 to global warming is insignificant, due to its low global warming potential and low atmospheric concentration.

HFC-32 is poorly absorbed in the body of mammalian species. Any absorbed HFC-32 is either exhaled unchanged, or rapidly metabolised and excreted, principally as exhaled carbon dioxide.

HFC-32 is essentially non-toxic to laboratory animals. There were minor effects, such as reduced breathing rate and salivation, during brief exposure to high concentrations (86,000 ppm for 4hours). Once the exposure stopped, animals behaved normally. HFC-32 (up to 350,000 ppm) did not cause cardiac sensitisation to adrenaline, but there were head and limb tremors (pre-narcosis) at 250,000 ppm and above.

Repeated exposure studies in rats (up to 50,000 ppm for 4 or 13 weeks) showed no effects that could be attributed to HFC-32. HFC-32 is not genotoxic in vitro or in vivo. HFC-32 is poorly absorbed and does not form any toxicologically significant metabolites. As a consequence, HFC-32 is unlikely to be carcinogenic.

In developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits, HFC-32 (up to 50,000 ppm) did not interfere with embryo-foetal development or fertility, but foetotoxicity (in the rat) could not be ruled out completely.

There are no known adverse health effects of HFC-32 on humans. In the USA, an occupational exposure limit (8-hour time-weighted-average concentration) of 1,000 ppm is recommended by the American Industrial Hygiene Association.

[1] ECETOC (1995). JACC 032
[2] A cooperative research effort (1987-2000) sponsored by 16 of the leading CFC producers [www.afeas.org/paft/]

Download document