We’re Hiring: Join the ECETOC Team as a Trainee!
390494

We’re Hiring: Join the ECETOC Team as a Trainee!

Are you passionate about science, regulatory toxicology, and making a real-world impact at the intersection of industry, academia, and policy? ECETOC is excited to announce that we’re looking for a...
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
390456

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
TRA Task Force – Worker branch

TRA Task Force – Worker branch

Why? The Worker TRA Task Force has been active since 2019, delivering projects that advance the scientific basis of the Worker Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) tool. Its overarching objective is to e...
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Event
15.03.2017

Workshop Session: Data Standardization Across ’Omic Platforms in Regulatory Toxicology

ECETOC Workshop Session at 56th Annual SOT Meeting and ToxExpo, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 15 March 2017.
Chairperson(s): Weida Tong, US FDA/NCTR, Jefferson, AR; and Timothy W. Gant, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Effects, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Endorser(s): Molecular and Systems Biology Specialty Section Regulatory and Safety Evaluation Specialty Section Risk Assessment Specialty Section

Molecular events associated with the effects of chemical, biological, and physical agents on biological systems can be globally determined using ’omic high-throughput technologies. These technologies are playing a major role in the generation of new knowledge and understanding in mechanisms of toxicity. However, use and application of these technologies has been slower in hazard identification and regulatory risk assessment. This slow uptake has been associated with technical issues of data quality and reproducibility. Although such challenges still exist, the main challenge now is achieving consistency in data processing and biological interpretation. Consistent methods and agreed frameworks and processes for collection/curating, processing, analyzing, and interpreting data are paramount to support regulatory assessments. Consensus amongst stakeholders including industry, academia, and regulatory agencies on this issue will provide guidance and confidence on how ’omic technologies can be applied in regulatory decision-making.

To that end, this workshop aimed to propose transparent frameworks and suitable processes to provide a baseline and confidence on the application of ’omics in regulatory decision making, with a specific emphasis on data analysis and interpretation in risk assessment. Challenges and issues in the regulatory application of ’omic data were addressed in the context of status and future direction for developing objective protocols for the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of ’omic results. The presenters gave their views on a path forward with time for the audience to respond and discuss. The session will have been of interest to bioinformaticians, research toxicologists, and regulators alike, and welcomed input from all of these sectors.

#3084 2:00 Data Standardization Across ’Omic Platforms
in Regulatory Toxicology.
2:00 Introduction. W. Tong. US FDA/NCTR, Jefferson,
AR.

#3085 2:05 Towards Developing a Framework for Using
New Technologies in Next Generation Risk
Assessment and Decision Making. A. Poole.
ECETOC, Brussels, Belgium. Sponsor: W. Tong

#3086 2:30 Quality Assurance of ’Omics Technologies
Considering GLP-Like Requirements. B.v.
Ravenzwaay. BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

#3087 2:55 Transcriptomics Data Analysis: Lessons
Learned from the US FDA-Led Community-
Wide Consortium Effort. W. Tong. US FDA/NCTR,
Jefferson, AR.

#3088 3:20 Analyzing Data: Towards Developing a
Framework for Transcriptomics and Other "Big
Data” Analysis for Regulatory Application. T.W.
Gant. Chemical and Environmental Effects, Public
Health England, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

#3089 3:45 Standardization in Metabolomics—The
Current Effort and Future Directions. H.C. Keun.
Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sponsor: W. Tong
4:10 Panel Discussion/Q&A.