2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Why?Validation of NAMs is often overlooked despite its importance for regulatory use. Traditional validation methods are less suitable for NAMs, which focus on key events rather than apical...
Event
05.12.2011

Epigenetics and Chemical Safety

5-6 December 2011

Venue:Hotel Quirinale

Via Nazionale 7, 00184 Rome, Italy
Tel: +39 06 4707 825/827
Fax: +39 06 4820 099
www.hotelquirinale.it

Background to this workshop

Currently, the main applications of “omics technologies (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabonomics) in toxicology are in the development of methods for prioritising chemicals for screening and testing. The potential of these technologies in chemical hazard identification and risk assessment is well recognised as they offer certain advantages over traditional toxicological approaches (ECETOC, 2001; Sarrif et al, 2005, ECETOC 2008, 2010).

With the increased attention to and interest in epigenomics in the scientific community, this field is rapidly evolving but is still at a relatively early stage with respect to its application in (eco)toxicology. Currently, epigenetic testing is insufficiently validated in order to be included into the regulatory process. For example, there is no single test available for determining epigenetic effects and there is an incomplete understanding of the normal DNA-modification patterns and long-term effects to e.g. the public health. In addition, a screening scheme to prioritise chemicals through epigenetic analysis has not been developed. Epigenetic changes can be triggered by environmental factors. For example exposure to metals, persistent organic pollutants or endocrine disrupting chemicals has been shown to modulate epigenetic marks, not only in mammalian cells or rodents, but also in environmentally relevant species such as fish or water fleas.

In order to increase our understanding of the science of epigenetics in toxicology and risk assessment, a solid understanding of the biology and variation in the epigenome is essential to eliminate concerns about possible adverse health effects related to epigenetic changes. In particular, very little is known about which epigenetic alterations are part of normal variability and what could be considered adverse and, hence, pose a health risk. Also, the extent to which the fundamental principles that guide toxicology such as: relevant doses, dose-rates, routes of exposure, and experimental models, should to be taken into consideration in the design and interpretation of epigenomic studies is still under debate.

The workshop will address the following aspects:

  • to examine scientific and technological approaches to identify and quantify epigenetic effects of chemicals and to assess their potential effects on human health and ecology.
  • to consider the strengths and weaknesses and the costs and benefits of looking at epigenetic effects of chemicals by using new approaches and technologies.

In particular the workshop will address the following points:

  1. Definition of epigenetic changes and effects in the context of (eco-) toxicology.
  2. What are the consequences of epigenetic changes induced by exogenous substances on human and environmental health?
  3. Is the current way of assessing the safety of chemicals able to detect adverse effects related to epigenetic changes?
  4. Case studies: implications of epigenetics in adverse effects in Humans, in animal models and ecotoxicology

Workshop Structure

  • Series of 20-minute talks and case studies.
  • Syndicate sessions addressing specific questions.
  • Plenary feedback.
  • Further discussions.
  • Conclusions.

Registration