2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Why?Validation of NAMs is often overlooked despite its importance for regulatory use. Traditional validation methods are less suitable for NAMs, which focus on key events rather than apical...
In The Press
04.03.2024

ECETOC publication addresses Dose Level Selection in Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Studies

Navigating the intricacies of dose level selection in toxicity studies poses significant challenges, particularly concerning the highest dose tested. To offer further analysis and guidance on this topic, ECETOC gathered a team of experts from governments, academia, NGO’s and industry and recently published the results of their work, which focuses specifically on developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies.

Their evaluation identified a significant divergence between the current European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) recommendations and the established guidelines from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), as well as the consensus among DART experts. The primary findings indicate that the increase in dose levels – advised by ECHA – aiming to induce clear signs of reproductive toxicity may lead to excessive, non-relevant secondary effects. This misalignment poses risks of misinterpreting study outcomes, potentially impacting human health risk assessments.

"As our understanding of toxicity evolves, it's imperative that our methodologies and approaches to dose level selection evolve in tandem,” says Dr Dick Lewis, Regulatory Science Associates, lead author of the paper.  “ECETOC's guidance on dose level selection for DART studies represents a crucial step towards ensuring the relevance and reliability of toxicological research in protecting human health and the environment."

The experts’ report emphasizes the necessity of a balanced, biologically grounded approach to dose selection, respecting the intricate maternal-placental-fetal relationship, and calls for adherence to a framework that integrates scientific understanding with animal welfare and regulatory requirements.

"DART studies in animals are uniquely vulnerable to high dose-induced toxicity, which can yield findings irrelevant to human exposures and cause unnecessary animal suffering," says Dr Fiona Sewell, Head of Toxicology, NC3Rs. "This paper provides researchers with guidance on a science-driven approach to inform dose selection in these studies, to reduce and refine animal use and ensure meaningful, human-relevant data is generated.”

“At ECETOC, we remain committed to advancing scientific approaches in toxicology and ecotoxicology, promoting trusted, humane, and sustainable methodologies” comments Blanca Serrano, Secretary General of ECETOC “This report proves that by leveraging all available and relevant data, including in vitro and in silico tools, researchers can make informed decisions that prioritize human health protection while minimizing animal suffering."

Read the full article on Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. For more information on ECETOC's work on dose level selection in toxicity studies, please visit www.ecetoc.org.