2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
TRA Task Force – Worker branch

TRA Task Force – Worker branch

Why? The Worker TRA Task Force has been active since 2019, delivering projects that advance the scientific basis of the Worker Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) tool. Its overarching objective is to e...
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Technical Report
29.07.2001

TR 080 – Aquatic Toxicity of Mixtures

TR 080 : Aquatic Toxicity of Mixtures | July 2001

The inherent toxicity of a substance to aquatic organisms is typically determined via single species laboratory tests. Results from these tests are used to determine a Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) for ecosystems per substance. Since organisms in the environment are exposed simultaneously to a wide array of substances, it is important to understand the potential effects of mixtures to aquatic organisms. The effects of mixtures can be generally categorised as additive, greater than additive (synergism) and less than additive (antagonism). Effects that correspond to the addition of toxicities for each mixture component are considered additive.

Via acute toxicity tests, mixtures of substances that are chemically related or have the same mode of action are generally found to be additive. However, some "groups" of substances when tested in relatively simple mixtures do not behave in a readily predictable manner (e.g. metals and some pesticides). Even so there are only a few examples in the literature of synergism where the effects are more than 3 times greater than those predicted from additivity of acute toxic effects. When large numbers of substances are present in mixtures at low concentrations relative to their individual acute toxicities, additivity of acute toxic effects is closely followed. This holds true even when the substances are not related chemically, or exhibit different modes of action when acting as acute toxicants alone. This phenomenon for organic substances has been called "baseline toxicity", or narcosis.

The same theory applies to chronic toxicity tests. That is, if organic mixture components are at concentrations below the level exerting chronic toxicity, then additivity can be expected ? thereby supporting the concept of baseline toxicity. Mixture components with the same mode of action can be expected also to act additively. However, It is not possible to make generalisations about the chronic toxicity of mixtures containing metals. Such mixtures can give responses across the entire range of interactions from antagonism to synergism. This may be due largely to different modes of action and differences in metal speciation in mixtures compared to single toxicant tests.

While data from model ecosystems, field studies and effluent studies are generally limited and difficult to interpret from the standpoint of the toxic effects of mixtures of substances, the evidence tends to support the basic concept of additivity, particularly when the role bioavailability can play in reducing toxic effects under environmental conditions is taken into account. Predicted mixture effects based on body residues from organisms exposed in the field indicate that additivity of substances below their PNECs (baseline toxicity approach) is sufficiently conservative for protection of aquatic resources.