2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Press Release
25.05.2022

ECETOC Expert Group identifies research needs to enable regulatory assessment of endocrine disruption in invertebrates

An ECETOC Expert Group on Endocrine Disruption Assessment in Invertebrates has just published its findings on the state of the science of invertebrate endocrine disruption in relation to EU regulation in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Sciences Europe (ESEU) [link].

The Expert Group identified the research needed to enable assessment of the potential for chemicals to disrupt the endocrine systems of invertebrates. There are an estimated 6.77 million invertebrate species worldwide, ranging from sponges through to more complex arthropods (insects, crustaceans) and molluscs. As many invertebrate populations are in decline, investigations about the possible contribution of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are justified. Research evidence shows some chemicals may disrupt invertebrate endocrine systems, but the extent of this is unclear.

Identifying an endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) according to EU regulations relies on the WHO definition[1] that requires demonstrating that an adverse effect in an intact organism is linked to an endocrine mechanism initiated by the chemical within the organism’s endocrine system. However, few data are available on invertebrate endocrine pathways (compared to the better studied vertebrate systems).  This is a major challenge to the development of mechanistic tests that can identify how these effects happen, i.e., the endocrine mode of action.

In its publication, the Expert Group outlines the breadth of invertebrate endocrine pathways for which EU regulation of potential EDCs may be relevant. It also reviews whether current knowledge meets regulatory requirements for invertebrates, including the suitability of current invertebrate test guidelines for detecting endocrine mechanisms and/or modes of action. Finally, it proposes a roadmap towards the regulation of potential invertebrate EDCs with greater confidence.

The Group concludes there are no validated in vitro and in vivo tools to identify EDCs in invertebrates according to the WHO definition. Whilst commonly used invertebrate toxicity tests might identify adverse effects that could potentially be caused by endocrine disruption, these tests do not identify how this happens, i.e., the endocrine mode of action. As a result, EU regulatory requirements for the identification of EDCs cannot currently be satisfied for invertebrates, either in general or for the specific invertebrates used in standard ecotoxicological studies. The Group also recommends establishing a clear definition of invertebrate protection goals (i.e., what to protect, where to protect it, over what time period, etc.) and identification of associated representative invertebrate model test species and endocrine disruption endpoints.

The Expert Group scientists propose that the most important research needed is to compile a comprehensive list of endocrine-related Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) across different invertebrate groups, which could then be used to develop endocrine Adverse Outcome Pathways. They acknowledge, however, that this research will require significant resource investment to develop and implement.

[1] WHO-IPCS [World Health Organisation International Programme on Chemical Safety] (2002) Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.