New ECETOC expert report: Advancing OECD TG 309 biodegradation testing
390508

New ECETOC expert report: Advancing OECD TG 309 biodegradation testing

A new expert meeting report is now available on the ECETOC website exploring how OECD TG 309 can be made more robust and environmentally relevant for chemical persistence assessment. The report ref...
We’re Hiring: Join the ECETOC Team as a Trainee!
390494

We’re Hiring: Join the ECETOC Team as a Trainee!

Are you passionate about science, regulatory toxicology, and making a real-world impact at the intersection of industry, academia, and policy? ECETOC is excited to announce that we’re looking for a...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
TRA Task Force – Worker branch

TRA Task Force – Worker branch

Why? The Worker TRA Task Force has been active since 2019, delivering projects that advance the scientific basis of the Worker Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) tool. Its overarching objective is to e...
Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Immunotoxicity assessment: Addressing Challenges and Advancing Methodologies [Workshop → Task Force]​

Why?Regulatory assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals is a complex and challenging task​ Limited regulatory guidance exists​ Lack of industry and regulatory knowledge​...
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Task Force
20.08.2024

Evaluation of a comparative safety assessment approach for products in the SSbD context

Dissemination

SETAC 2025, Europe 35th Annual Meeting, Poster: SETAC Europe 2025 - ECETOC Poster Safety Assessment Taskforce

Why

Stakeholders across various sectors, including industry and regulatory bodies, consistently seek better and more sustainable alternatives throughout a product life cycle. Measuring the actual improvement in safety and sustainability performance requires quantitative metrics aggregated into a comprehensive evaluation. While there are approaches and tools available for safety and sustainability assessment, their application and relevance for mixtures are not thoroughly evaluated.

A large portion of incremental innovations stem from the creation of a new mixture of an already established products by the modification of one or two chemicals in the mixture. Hence, a comparative safety assessment approach for mixtures is needed to evaluate the impact of  these changes on safety and sustainability. This approach aligns with the the European Commission Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS) (EC, 2020), and the Zero Pollution Action Plan (EC, 2021), pointed out the need for safer and more sustainable chemicals, materials, processes and products according to the safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) framework published by the JRC (2022).  Therefore, the key question is: what are the suitable safety metrics for evaluating safety and sustainability trade-offs in mixtures?

To date, comparative safety assessments of mixtures remain unexplored. ECETOC’s unique expertise in chemical safety assessment will be leveraged to develop and evaluate such an approach, providing crucial input for multidimensional sustainability evaluations of mixtures.

Objectives

  • Develop a robust and comprehensive comparative safety assessment approach, including relevant safety metrics, applicable across multiple categories and life cycle stages.
  • Support general comparative safety of mixtures and inform the development of practical and user-friendly tools.

Timeline and Deliverables

Work started in July 2024 and had a rescope in December 2024. The Task Force plans to have a selection criteria for comparative mixture safety assessments ready by the end of 2026. An open Workshop involving relevant parties is expected after the results are published..

Areas of work
AI-Big Data