2025 Annual Report
Annual Report
ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives
Press Release

ECETOC publishes a framework for the risk assessment of plastic additives

Part 1 sets out the fundamental elements, from problem formulation to risk characterisation.Brussels, 22 July 2026. The ECETOC Plastic Additives Task Force has published the first of two peer...
January 2026 news from the Sec Gen
News

January 2026 news from the Sec Gen

Dear colleagues and friends,As we begin a new year, I would like to thank you for your continued engagement and trust in ECETOC. 2026 promises to be an exciting and dynamic year, and I am pleased...
HSSD Tool

HSSD Tool

This software was developed by a consortium of partners to facilitate the uptake of novel approaches to estimate aquatic threshold concentrations (e.g. the concentration at which 5% of the species are exposed above their EC50, HC5).
The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

The Human Exposure Assessment Tools Database (heatDB)

heatdb is a public directory of exposure data sources as well as available tools for exposure
NanoApp

NanoApp

ECETOC’s NanoApp is a tool designed to define the boundaries of sets of similar nanoforms and to generate a justification for the REACH registration.
Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA)

The Targeted Risk Assessment (TRA) estimates exposures to workers, consumers and the environment that arise during a series of events.
Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Chronic fish case studies towards an IATA

Why?Hazard and safety assessments for the pelagic compartment often rely on in vivo studies using a single fish species, raising ethical concerns and uncertainty in terms of extrapolation....
Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Estimating the environmental release of Synthetic Polymeric Microparticles from Products

Why?REACH restriction: SPM use restricted; emissions reporting required by May 2027. Gap: No analytical methods available to measure SPM emissions. Solution: Draft SPERC-based approac...
Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Case Studies on Reliability and Relevance Considerations during Validation of NAMs

Why?Validation of NAMs is often overlooked despite its importance for regulatory use. Traditional validation methods are less suitable for NAMs, which focus on key events rather than apical...
Article
16.12.2015

Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and 4 testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice

ECETOC concept allows assessing the safety of nanomaterials  undertaking animal testing only as a very last resort

Brussels, December 2015

The safety of nanomaterials can be ensured by testing and grouping based on material properties and interactions, undertaking animal testing only as a very last resort. This is the outcome of the now published Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice. DF4nanoGrouping is a comprehensive concept to group and test nanomaterials that the ECETOC Nano Task Force developed and published earlier this year.

Science-based grouping approaches allow the prediction of a substance?s toxicity by comparing it to other similar substances. Thereby, substance safety may be determined while considerably saving time, money and animal testing. However, due to the complex interactions of nanomaterials with their environment, a comprehensive grouping concept for nanomaterials has not yet been available. DF4nanoGrouping helps close this gap for hazard assessment. In three tiers, DF4nanoGrouping takes into consideration all relevant properties of nanomaterials. Step-by-step, potential hazards are ruled out. Hazardous nanomaterials are identified using non-animal testing, which may then be further examined applying animal tests.

Now, case studies using a total of 24 materials confirmed the usefulness of DF4nanoGrouping. For 21 materials the non-animal testing tiers correctly predicted the outcome of the animal tests. For 3 further materials, the non-animal tiers ?over-predicted? concerns that were not confirmed in the animal tests. This shows that DF4nanoGrouping is conservative: All materials that may be hazardous are recognized in the non-animal tiers. Consequently, DF4nanoGrouping provides a sound scientific basis for hazard assessment.

The ECETOC Nano Task Force Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice are published as an Open Access article in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Arts J, Irfan MA, Keene AM, Kreiling R, Lyon D, Maier M, Michel K, Neubauer N, Petry T, Sauer UG, Warheit D, Wiench K, Wohlleben W, Landsiedel R. 2015
Case studies putting the decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into practice
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology  (In press - corrected proof)
DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.11.020 (Open Access)

The following shortcut can be used to download the article from the publisher's website:
http://bit.ly/ecetoc-arts-et-al-2015b

2 earlier publications from this Task Force are also available online. For more details see:


Find out more
http://bit.ly/ecetoc-arts-et-al-2015b