Workshop Report 28
- Pages
- Summary
- Workshop Overview
- PRESENTATION SUMMARIES
- Sense, simplicity and successes of SSDs in environmental protection, assessment and management
- Ecological limitations of SSDs
- How do species traits influence sensitivity and herewith species sensitivity distributions?
- Field validation of species sensitivity distributions
- Derivation of toxicity thresholds for LAS – integration of QSARs, SSDs, mesocosms, and field data
- Field-based SSD and community sensitivity distribution as alternative ways for field validation of the PNECs derived from laboratory based approaches
- HC5 estimation in SSDs revisited
- Assessment factors for deriving PNECs: Food for thought
- Weight of evidence approaches for deriving HC5s
- Sample size in PNEC derivation
- How to extrapolate across 100,000+ substances, sites and species with SSDs ?
- Interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) models predict supplemental toxicity data for SSDs
- HC5s from taxonomically structured hierarchical SSDs
- Demonstration of the web-based interspecies correlation estimation (Web-ICE) modelling application
- Regulatory applications of SSDs in European regulations
- Regulatory use of SSDs in Australia and New Zealand
- Use of SSD in China
- Use of SSD to derive no-effect thresholds for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments in Canada
- Use of SSDs in the USA – endangered species and water quality criteria
- SYNDICATE SESSIONS
- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- ABBREVIATIONS
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- APPENDIX A: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
- APPENDIX B: WORKSHOP PROGRAMME
- APPENDIX C: ORGANISING COMMITTEE
- ECETOC PUBLISHED REPORTS